4.5 Article

Rapid LC-MS-based metabolomics method to study the Fusarium infection of barley

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 8, Pages 912-919

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201301292

Keywords

Barley; Fusarium head blight; LC-MS; Metabolomics; Mycotoxins

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM 6046137305]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic [NAZV QI111B044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultra high performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry was applied to evaluate the potential of nontarget metabolomic fingerprinting in order to distinguish Fusarium-infected and control barley samples. First, the sample extraction and instrumental conditions were optimized to obtain the broadest possible representation of polar/medium-polar compounds occurring in extracts obtained from barley grain samples. Next, metabolomic fingerprints of extracts obtained from nine barley varieties were acquired under ESI conditions in both positive and negative mode. Each variety of barley was tested in two variants: artificially infected by Fusarium culmorum at the beginning of heading and a control group (no infection). In addition, the dynamics of barley infection development was monitored using this approach. The experimental data were statistically evaluated by principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering analysis, and orthogonal partial least-squares discriminant analysis. The differentiation of barley in response to F. culmorum infection was feasible using this metabolomics-based method. Analysis in positive mode provided a higher number of molecular features as compared to that performed under negative mode setting. However, the analysis in negative mode permitted the detection of deoxynivalenol and deoxynivalenol-3-glucoside considered as resistance-indicator metabolites in barley.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available