4.5 Article

Sensitive monitoring of penicillin antibiotics in milk and honey treated by stir bar sorptive extraction based on monolith and LC-electrospray MS detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 907-915

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200987

Keywords

Milk and honey; Monolith; Penicillin antibiotics; Poly (vinylimidazole-divinylbenzene); Stir bar sorptive extraction

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21077085]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry
  3. Nature Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2010J01047]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CXB2011037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present study, a convenient and sensitive method for determination of six penicillin antibiotics (amoxicillin, ampicillin, penicillin G, oxacillin, cloxacillin, and dicloxacillin) in milk and honey samples was developed. Milk and honey samples were diluted with water, then directly treated by stir bar sorptive extraction based on poly (vinylimidazole-divinylbenzene) monolithic material as coating. The analytes were analyzed by LC/ESI- MS/MS. Several extraction parameters including extraction and desorption time, pH value, and ionic strength in sample matrix were investigated in detail. Under the optimized extraction conditions, the calculated detection limits for the target compounds were as low as 0.23-2.66 ng/kg in milk and 0.18-1.42 ng/kg in honey, respectively. Good linearity was obtained for analytes with the correlation coefficients (R2) above 0.997. Excellent method reproducibility was achieved in terms of intraday and interday precisions, indicated by the RSDs of <5.0 and <10.0%, respectively. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of penicillin antibiotics residues in different milk and honey samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available