4.5 Article

Ionic liquids dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and HPLC-atomic fluorescence spectrometric determination of mercury species in environmental waters

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 414-420

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201200571

Keywords

Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry; Ionic liquids; Mercury speciation; Environmental water

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KF2011-15]
  2. Zhejiang Environmental Protection Bureau [2011B27]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An ionic liquid (IL) based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with HPLC hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry method for the preconcentration and determination of mercury species in environmental water samples is described. Four mercury species (MeHg+, EtHg+, PhHg+, andHg(2+)) were complexed with dithionate and the neutral chelates were extracted into IL drops using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Variables affecting the formation and extraction of mercury dithizonates were optimized. The optimum conditions found were as follows: IL-type and amount, 0.05 g of 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate; dispersive solvents type and amount, 500 mu L of acetone; pH, 6; extraction time, 2 min; centrifugation time, 12 min; and no sodium chloride addition. Under the optimized conditions, the detection limits of the analytes were 0.031 mu g/L for Hg2+, 0.016 mu g/L for MeHg+, 0.024 mu g/L for EtHg+, and 0.092 mu g/L for PhHg+, respectively. The repeatability of the method, expressed as RSD, was between 1.4 and 5.2% (n = 10), and the average recoveries for spiked test were 96.9% for Hg2+, 90.9% for MeHg+, 90.5% for EtHg+, 92.3% for PhHg+, respectively. The developed method was successfully applied for the speciation of mercury in environmental water samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available