4.1 Article

School-Wide Programs Aimed at Obesity Among Latino Youth in the United States: A Review of the Evidence

Journal

JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages 239-246

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/josh.12144

Keywords

childhood obesity; Latino; school-based interventions; review

Funding

  1. Intramural CDC HHS [CC999999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCCDPHP CDC HHS [U48 DP001917, 1U48 DP001917] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDIn the past 30years, childhood obesity rates have tripled, disproportionately affecting Latino children. From 2003 to 2006, 43.0% of Mexican-American children were classified as overweight compared with 36.9% of non-Hispanic Whites. Obesity interventions targeting children can have a significant impact in the school setting. METHODSWe conducted a systematic review of evidence-based, obesity-related interventions in the school setting. Inclusion criteria included: having 50% or more Latino children in the study, and usage of obesity-related outcomes (eg, body mass index [BMI] z-score, weight, and waist circumference, and body fat). RESULTSThe majority of identified studies included interventions that targeted both nutrition and physical activity. The most successful interventions were randomized, controlled trials or quasi-experimental controlled studies and had few limitations in execution in the study; however, overall results were mixed. There are promising results for interventions targeting Latino children who are already overweight or obese, but evidence of effectiveness is sparse. CONCLUSIONSThis review is the first to gather evidence-based research systematically aimed at obesity-related interventions in the school setting that are specifically focused on Latino children. Results of the review are promising and timely, given the exigency of the needed evidence, and the current state of childhood obesity in the United States.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available