4.6 Article

Evaluation of low-velocity impact response of honeycomb sandwich structures using factorial-based design of experiments

Journal

JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 339-361

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1099636212442667

Keywords

prepreg; low-velocity impact; lay-up; response surface analysis; out-of-autoclave; ANOVA; regression analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A response surface analysis of data from factorial experiments is used to determine the effect of different design factors on the low-velocity impact response of the honeycomb sandwich structures. A low-cost, out-of-autoclave manufacturing process is utilized to manufacture aerospace quality honeycomb sandwich panels. CYCOM (R) 5320 out-of-autoclave prepreg and FM (R) 300-2M are used as facesheet and adhesive, respectively. The out-of-autoclave process uses the vacuum bag pressure, thus, avoiding costly tooling and making the process more economical. A completely randomized design is used while manufacturing and testing the samples. Three design factors: angle difference between successive prepreg layers, number of prepreg layers, and number of adhesive layers, are selected as experimental variables. Each variable is considered at three levels, yielding a 3(3) factorial design. To investigate the effect of the experimental variables on the three response variables: energy absorbed (X); peak contact force (Y) and maximum deflection (Z), a low-velocity impact test is conducted. Analysis of variance and response surface techniques are used to analyze the data. The significant design factors for each response variable are identified using analysis of variance. Response surface analysis is carried out and the resulting regression models are employed to quantify the behavior of each of the response variables in response to changes in the design factors. The regression models are verified with the confirmation test results and both are in close agreement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available