4.5 Article

Estimated Cutoff Points for the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score Based on C-reactive Protein in a Longitudinal Register of Early Arthritis

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 1439-1443

Publisher

J RHEUMATOL PUBL CO
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.091333

Keywords

DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE 28; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; OUTCOME; UNDIFFERENTIATED ARTHRITIS; DISEASE ACTIVITY; REMISSION

Categories

Funding

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS 05/2044, 05/2041]
  2. RETICS Program [RD08/0075]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To estimate the cutoff points for the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) calculated using C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements from patients with early arthritis. Methods. We analyzed data from 568 visits of 207 patients enrolled in our prospective longitudinal register of early arthritis. Six rheumatologists evaluated the degree of disease activity at each visit on the basis of the available clinical data, and the final degree of disease activity was established by consensus. DAS28 values were calculated for each visit using CRP or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Through a ROC analysis, cutoff points for both indices, as well as for minimal disease activity (MDA), were selected on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. Results. The cutoff values to classify disease activity with the DAS28-CRP were 2.3, 3.8, and 4.9, considering remission at < 2.3, low disease activity 2.3-3.8, moderate disease activity 3.8-4.9, and high disease activity > 4.9. The cutoff value for MDA when calculated with CRP was 2.6. The area under the ROC curves was always greater for DAS28-CRP than for DAS28-ESR, reaching statistical significance for low/moderate activity and for the MDA. Conclusion. Our study confirms that the cutoff points for DAS28-CRP are lower than those described for DAS28-ESR, suggesting that DAS28-CRP may be more accurate to assess disease activity in our population. (First Release May 15 2010; J Rheumatol 2010;37:1439-43; doi:10.3899/jrheum.091333)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available