4.5 Article

The matching of a one-dimensional numerical simulation and experiment results for low viscosity Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids during fast filament stretching and subsequent break-up

Journal

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 159-183

Publisher

SOC RHEOLOGY
DOI: 10.1122/1.3669647

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ANR PAN'H
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) [EP/H018913/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H018913/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/H018913/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a model for fast filament stretching, thinning, and break-up for Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids, and the results are compared against experimental data where fast filament relaxation occurs. A 1D approximation was coupled with the arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) formulation to perform simulations that captured both filament thinning and break-up. The modeling accounts for both the initial polymer stretching processes from the precise movement of the two moving pistons and also the subsequent thinning when the pistons are at rest. The simulations were first validated for a low viscosity Newtonian fluid matched to experimental data obtained from a recently developed apparatus, the Cambridge Trimaster. A non-Newtonian polymer fluid, with high frequency linear viscoelastic behavior characterized using a piezoaxial vibrator rheometer, was modeled using both an Oldroyd-B and FENE-CR single-mode constitutive models. The simulations of the filament deformation were compared with experiment. The simulations showed a generally reasonable agreement with both the stretch and subsequent relaxation experimental responses, although the mono mode models used in this paper were unable to capture all of the details for the experimental time evolution relaxation profile of the central filament diameter. (C) 2012 The Society of Rheology. [DOI: 10.1122/1.3669647]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available