4.2 Article

Development of Interspecies Cloned Monkey Embryos Reconstructed with Bovine Enucleated Oocytes

Journal

JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 306-313

Publisher

SOCIETY REPRODUCTION & DEVELOPMENT-SRD
DOI: 10.1262/jrd.20049

Keywords

Bovine oocyte; Embryo; Interspecies cloning; Monkey; Oct-4 transcription factor

Funding

  1. The Royal Golden Jubliee Ph.D. Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was carried out to determine whether Culture media reconstructed with bovine enucleated oocytes and the expression pattern of Oct-4 Could support dedifferentiaton of monkey fibroblasts in interspecies cloned monkey embryos. In this study, monkey and bovine skin fibroblasts were used as donor cells for reconstruction with bovine enucleated oocytes. The reconstructed monkey interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer (iSCNT) embryos were then Cultured under six different Culture conditions with modifications of the embryo culture media and normal bovine and monkey specifications. The Oct-4 expression patterns of the embryos were examined at the two-cell to blastocyst stages using immunocytochemistry. The monkey iSCNT embroys showed similar cleavage rates to those of bovine SCNT and bovine parthenogenetic activation (PA). However, the monkey iSCNT embryos were not able to develop beyond the 16-cell stage under any of the culture conditions. In monkey and bovine SCNT embryos, Oct-4 could be detected front the two-cell to blastocyst stage, and in bovine PA embryos, Oct-4 was detectable from the morula to blastocyst stage. These results suggested that bovine ooplasm could Support dedifferentiation of monkey somatic Cell nuclei but could not support embryo development to either the compact morula or blastocyst stage. In conclusion, we found that the Culture conditions that tend to enhance monkey iSCNT embryo development and the expression pattern of Oct-4 in cloned embryos (monkey iSCNT and bovine SCNT) are different than in bovine PA embryos.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available