4.5 Article

Structure and properties of flax/polylactide/alumina nanocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 23-33

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0731684412464586

Keywords

Polylactide; flax; alumina; natural fiber; composites; nanospray

Funding

  1. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme [214467]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Composites composed of polylactide (PLA), woven flax fiber textiles (weave style of 2 x 2 twill and 4 x 4 hopsack) and boehmite alumina were produced by hot press. The spraying technique served for the pre-dispersion of the alumina nanoparticles. The aqueous alumina slurry was produced by mixing the water with water dispersible alumina. The dispersion of the flax structures and alumina particles in the composites was studied by scanning electron microscopy. The polylactide composites were subjected to water absorption and instrumented falling weight impact tests. The creep and thermomechanical properties of the composites were determined in short-time creep tests (performed at various temperatures), thermogravimetric analysis and dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis, respectively. It was found that the incorporation of alumina particles reduced the water uptake compared to the polylactide/flax blends. The impact energy and stiffness value of polylactide/flax blends was markedly higher than that of PLA but reflected the effects of composite structures. Incorporation of alumina particles enhanced storage modulus and the creep resistance compared to the polylactide/flax blends but slightly incremented thermal resistance at high temperature. No clear trend in the flax weave style-effect was found in the thermal behavior. The creep master curves were constructed by applying the time-temperature superposition principle. The Findley power law could satisfactorily describe the creep compliance versus time traces for all systems studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available