4.5 Article

Influence of chemical foaming agent on the physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/wood flour/nanoclay composites

Journal

JOURNAL OF REINFORCED PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES
Volume 30, Issue 13, Pages 1115-1124

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0731684411417200

Keywords

chemical foaming agent; wood plastic nanocomposite; cell size; density; tensile modulus; water uptake

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the effects of chemical foaming agent and nanoclay on the physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of composites based on HDPE and WF were described. To meet this objective, the nanoclay, HDPE and the coupling agent were compounded and granulated and mixed with WF and blowing agent in a twin-screw extruder. Consequently, the foaming process was completed in the injection stage. The amount of WF was fixed at 50 wt% for all samples. For nanoclay (organomodified montmorillonite) and CBA (azodicarbonamide), different levels of 0, 2, 4, 6 per hundred resins (phr) and 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 phr were considered, respectively. Results indicate that the cell size and the average cell density of samples increased with the increase in the chemical foaming agent content. However, on addition of nanoclay to HDPE/WF composite foams, the cell size was decreased and their cell density increased. SEM confirmed that the chemical foaming agent and nanoclay contents had significant influence on density reduction of foamed composites. Finally, by increase in the chemical foaming agent content, the tensile modulus decreased and the water absorption and thickness swelling of HDPE/WF nanocomposite increased. The nanoclay dispersion quality is quite an important factor for the physical and mechanical properties of both foamed and unfoamed wood plastic nanocomposites. It was found that the optimal condition was attained by incorporating 0.5 phr foaming agent and 4 phr nanoclay in composite formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available