3.9 Article

Effect of service dogs on manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: A pilot study

Journal

Publisher

JOURNAL REHAB RES & DEV
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2011.07.0124

Keywords

assistive device; manual wheelchair; mobility; quality of life; rehabilitation; service dog; shoulder pain; social participation; spinal cord injury; wheelchair skills

Categories

Funding

  1. Master's fellowship from le Fond Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Societe et la Culture
  2. MIRA Foundation
  3. Institute of Aging of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Fonds de la recherche en sante du Quebec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Service dogs help people with mobility impairments. They are trained to perform a variety of tasks, such as opening doors, retrieving the telephone, picking up objects, and pulling manual wheelchairs (MWCs). More specifically, using the traction provided by the service dog has physical benefits because MWC users can operate their MWCs with less effort. The objective of this study was to document the effect of a service dog on MWC mobility and user shoulder pain, social participation, and quality of life. Eleven MWC users with spinal cord injury were assessed before and after training with a service dog and 7 mo later. Based on a standardized protocol, all study participants learned how to use the service dog safely and how to move around efficiently in different environments and under different conditions. Results showed that using a service dog increased the distance covered by the MWC users and also significantly decreased shoulder pain and intensity of effort. Using the service dog also produced slight but significant improvements in MWC user skills and social participation and may indicate a trend for improvement in quality of life. More extensive research is needed to precisely identify the effect of service dogs on the long-term management of MWC use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available