3.9 Article

Selection of muscle and nerve-cuff electrodes for neuroprostheses using customizable musculoskeletal model

Journal

Publisher

JOURNAL REHAB RES & DEV
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.02.0034

Keywords

functional electrical stimulation; muscle electrode; musculoskeletal model; nerve-cuff electrode; neuroprosthesis; rehabilitation; shoulder; simulation; spinal cord injury; upper limb

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [N01-NS-1-2333, N01-NS-5-2365]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuroprosthetic systems based on functional electrical stimulation aim to restore motor function to individuals with paralysis following spinal cord injury. Identifying the optimal electrode set for the neuroprosthesis is complicated because it depends on the characteristics of the individual (such as injury level), the force capacities of the muscles, the movements the system aims to restore, and the hardware limitations (number and type of electrodes available). An electrode-selection method has been developed that uses a customized musculoskeletal model. Candidate electrode sets are created based on desired functional outcomes and the hardware limitations of the proposed system. Inverse-dynamic simulations are performed to determine the proportion of target movements that can be accomplished with each set; the set that allows the most movements to be performed is chosen as the optimal set. The technique is demonstrated here for a system recently developed by our research group to restore whole-arm movement to individuals with high-level tetraplegia. The optimal set included selective nerve-cuff electrodes for the radial and musculocutaneous nerves; single-channel cuffs for the axillary, suprascapular, upper subscapular, and long-thoracic nerves; and muscle-based electrodes for the remaining channels. The importance of functional goals, hardware limitations, muscle and nerve anatomy, and surgical feasibility are highlighted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available