4.5 Article

EFFECTIVENESS OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND COSTS IN PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL SIGNS OF SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME: ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 1029-1036

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1867

Keywords

shoulder impingement syndrome; manual therapy; physiotherapy; exercise therapy; rehabilitation; randomized controlled trial

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To investigate the effect of manual physiotherapy and exercises compared with exercises alone in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome one year after inclusion. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: Patients with shoulder impingement of more than 4 weeks. Methods: The intervention group received individualized manual physiotherapy plus individualized exercises; the control group received individualized exercises only. Both groups had 10 treatments over 5 weeks; afterwards all patients continued their exercises for another 7 weeks at home. Primary outcomes were the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Patients' Global Impression of Change. The Generic Patient-Specific Scale was used as secondary outcome. Costs were recorded in a log-book. Results: Ninety patients were included in the study and 87 could be analyzed at 1-year follow-up. Both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome measures, but no difference was detected between the groups. Only costs differed significantly in favour of the control group (p=0.03) after 5 weeks. Conclusion: Individualized exercises resulted in lower costs than manual physiotherapy and showed a significant effect on pain and functioning within the whole group after one year. Exercises should therefore be considered as a basic treatment. Due to the progressive improvement that occurred during the follow-up period with individualized exercises further treatments should be delayed for 3 to 4 months.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available