4.5 Review

THE ADDED VALUE OF AN ACTUATED ANKLE-FOOT ORTHOSIS TO RESTORE NORMAL GAIT FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SPINAL CORD INJURY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 299-309

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0958

Keywords

actuated ankle-foot orthosis; spinal cord injury; rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel [GOA59]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To provide an overview of robot-assisted rehabilitation devices developed for actuation of the ankle-foot complex and their ability to influence the attributes of normal gait in patients with spinal cord injury. Methods: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, National Academic Research and Collaborations Information System, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (1985-2011), using, ankle, foot, robotics, orthotics and spinal cord injury as most relevant keywords. Article inclusion was performed in 3 stages; at the level of: (i) title, (ii) abstract and (iii) full text. Results: The actuated ankle-foot orthoses currently available are characterized by several combinations of an actuator and a control mechanism. Both the actuator and the control strategy substantially influence human-machine interaction and therefore the potential of the device to assist in modifying locomotor function and potentially modify the underlying motor control mechanisms. Conclusion: Due to small sample sizes, limited studies in patients with spinal cord injury, and limitations in study design, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions on the effect of different types of actuated ankle-foot orthoses. Based on the limited data available, pneumatic artificial muscles in combination with proportional myoelectric control are suggested to have the potential to meet most of the preconditions to restore the attributes of normal gait and therefore facilitate neuroplasticity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available