4.5 Article

ARM STUDIO TO INTENSIFY UPPER LIMB REHABILITATION AFTER STROKE: CONCEPT, ACCEPTANCE, UTILIZATION AND PRELIMINARY CLINICAL RESULTS

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 310-314

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0517

Keywords

arm rehabilitation; stroke; robotics

Funding

  1. Verein zur Forderung der Hirnforschung und Rehabilitation e.V.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To assess the acceptance, utilization and clinical results of an arm studio designed to intensify treatment of the severely to moderately affected arm after stroke. In line with a distal bilateral approach, the equipment comprised 4 workstations, 1 finger trainer, and 3 machines for bilateral training of selected distal and proximal movements. Design: Open study. Subjects: Of 119 treated patients after subacute stroke, 30 completed a questionnaire and 24 were assessed. Methods: All patients completed 15 sessions, each of 30-45 min duration, on each of 2 workstations. Based on the patients' impairment level they were divided into 3 groups, as follows: group A, plegic; group B, proximal and distal movements but hand non-functional; and group C, able to grasp and release an object. Motor functions were assessed with the Fugl-Meyer Score (FM, 0-66) for groups A (n=6) and B (n=6), and the Action Arm Research Test (ARAT, 0-57) for group C (n=12). Results: No side-effects occurred. The patients regarded the training positively. The initial FM was 8.5 (standard deviation (SD) 3.3) and final FM 21.2 (SD 4.4) for group A, initial FM 25.3 (SD 6.9) and final FM 44.3 (SD 9.1) for group B, and initial ARAT 33.3 (SD 11.2) and final ARAT 43.5 (SD 10.7) for group C. Conclusion: The use of the arm studio to intensify upper limb rehabilitation after stroke is promising, and a controlled study is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available