4.5 Article

Systematic co-operation between employer, occupational health service and social insurance office:: A 6-year follow-up of vocational rehabilitation for people on sick-leave, including economic benefits

Journal

JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 628-636

Publisher

FOUNDATION REHABILITATION INFORMATION
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0233

Keywords

vocational rehabilitation; sick-leave; longitudinal studies; economics; intervention studies; return to work; co-operation

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Mid-Sweden University
  2. Social Insurance Office in Stockholm, Sweden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To evaluate the effects of systematic co-operation among municipal employees on the number of sick-leave days per month and the type of benefit granted by the Social Insurance Office. A further aim was to evaluate the economic consequences for society. Design: A 6-year follow-up study with a matched-pairs design. Methods: Days on sick-leave were calculated for each subject one year before the intervention started and yearly for the following 6-year period. Statistical mixed-model analysis was used. The economic benefit of the intervention was estimated as the increased production stemming from fewer days on sick-leave. Subjects: Sixty-four employees on long-term sick-leave were individually matched with controls from another Social Insurance Office in a county with a socioeconomic structure similar to that of the study group. Results: The study group had 5.7 fewer days on sick-leave per month and person over the 6-year period (p=0.003). The estimated average economic benefit of the intervention was (sic)36,600 per person over the 6-year period. In conclusion, those who received systematic co-operation in vocational rehabilitation had fewer days on sick-leave than their treatment-as-usual peers. This effect persisted over 6 years, generating substantial net economic gains for society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available