4.7 Article

Structural and luminescence studies of europium ions in lithium aluminium borophosphate glasses

Journal

JOURNAL OF RARE EARTHS
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 585-592

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60112-5

Keywords

europium ions; luminescence properties; borophosphate glasses; Judd-Ofelt analysis; decay time; rare earths

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE)
  2. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI)
  3. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia via Research University [R.J130000.7826.4F140]
  4. Nanofund Grant [J.130000.7926.4H007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eu3+ doped borophosphate glasses with the chemical composition 20Li(2)O=30Al(2)O(3)=10B(2)O(3)=40P(2)O(5)=xEu(2)O(3) (where x=0.05 mol.%, 0.1 mol.%, 1.0 mol.%, 1.5 mol.% and 2.0 mol.%) were prepared by conventional melt quenching technique. The structural and luminescence properties of the prepared Eu3+ doped borophosphate glasses were studied and compared with reported results. The XRD pattern showed the amorphous nature of the prepared glasses. Whereas, the FTIR spectra revealed the vibrational modes in the prepared glasses. The bonding parameters ((beta) over bar and delta) were calculated through the excitation spectra. Judd-Ofelt (J-O) intensity parameters were calculated from the emission spectra and were used to determine transition probability (A), stimulated emission cross-section (sigma(E)(P)), radiative lifetime (tau(R)) and branching ratios (beta(exp)) for the transition D-5(0)-> F-7(j) (j=1, 2, 3 and 4) of Eu3+ ions. Furthermore, the luminescence intensity ratio (R) of D-5(0)-> F-7(2) to D-5(0)-> F-7(1) transition was also calculated. Transition D-5(0)-> F-7(2) had the highest value of stimulated emission cross-section and branching ratios and the results were comparable with the reported values. This indicated that the present glass is promising host material for Eu3+ doped fiber amplifiers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available