4.7 Article

Quantifying the Effect of Competition for Detection between Coeluting Peptides on Detection Probabilities in Mass-Spectrometry-Based Proteomics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 348-361

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr400034z

Keywords

mass spectrometry (MS); MS-based proteomics; simulation; protein identification; protein abundance; retention time; elution time; LC-MS/MS; liquid chromatograph

Funding

  1. Office of the Vice President for Research
  2. Office of the Vice President for Information Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are many factors that contribute to the variation in detection probabilities of proteins in LC-MS/MS experiments, and currently little is known about their relative importance. In this study, we analyze the effect of competition for detection between coeluting peptides on peptide detection probability. Using a novel method for estimating peptide detection probabilities, we show that these probabilities can vary by an order of magnitude between peptides that elute from the liquid chromatograph at the same time as many other peptides and those that elute with fewer other peptides. To explore these results, we use a mathematical model to show that competition for detection between peptides is expected to be a major source of missed detections in complex mixtures because there will be many MS/MS scanning intervals that contain more coeluting peptides than can be subjected to MS/MS analysis. Our data and simulation results show that the number of coeluting peptides is a primary determinant of whether a peptide will be detected. In our data, this had a several-fold larger effect on peptide detection probability than did peptide abundance. Furthermore, the distribution of elution times for the most frequently detected peptides was strongly shifted toward values where there were few coeluting peptides, indicating that the number of coeluting peptides is a major determinant of whether a peptide is proteotypic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available