4.5 Article

Amino acid specificity of fibers of the facial/trigeminal complex innervating the maxillary barbel in the Japanese sea catfish, Plotosus japonicus

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 288-294

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.011

Keywords

Fish; Facial/trigeminal complex; Amino acids; Physiology; Behavior

Funding

  1. NIH U.S.-Japan Brain Research Cooperative Program [NS-04-014]
  2. George C. Kent Professorship (LSU College of Science)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan [22580205]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22580205] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Japanese sea catfish, Plotosus japonicus, possesses taste and solitary chemoreceptor cells (SCCs) located on the external body surface that detect specific water-soluble substances. Here, we identify two major fiber types of the facial/trigeminal complex that transmit amino acid information to the medulla. Both single and few fiber preparations respond to amino acid stimulation in the 0.1 mu M to mM range. One fiber type responds best to glycine and L-alanine (i.e. Gly/Ala fibers) whereas the other fiber type is best stimulated by L-proline and glycine betaine (hereafter referred to only as betaine) (i.e. Pro/Bet fibers). We demonstrate that betaine, which does not alter the pH of the seawater and therefore does not activate the animals' highly sensitive pH sensors (Caprio et al., Science 344:1154-1156,2014), is sufficient to elicit appetitive food search behavior. We further show that the amino acid specificity of fibers of the facial/trigeminal complex in P. japonicus is different from that in Ariopsis felis (Michel and Caprio, J. Neurophysiol. 66:247-260,1991; Michel et al.J. Comp. Physiol. A. 172:129138, 1993), a representative member of the only other family (Ariidae) of extant marine catfishes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available