4.7 Article

Proteome of Human Perilymph

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages 3845-3851

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr200346q

Keywords

perilymph; proteomics; mass spectrometry; human; vestibular schwannoma

Funding

  1. American Otologic Society (AOS)
  2. Massachusetts Life Sciences Center (MLSC)
  3. NIDCD [T32 DC00038, K08 DC010419]
  4. NIH [U24 DC008559]
  5. Harvard Medical School

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current diagnostic tools limit a clinician's ability to discriminate between many possible causes of sensorineural hearing loss. This constraint leads to the frequent diagnosis of the idiopathic condition, leaving patients without a clear prognosis and only general treatment options. As a first step toward developing new diagnostic tools and improving patient care, we report the first use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to map the proteome of human perilymph. Using LC-MS/MS, we analyzed four samples, two collected from patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) and two from patients undergoing cochlear implantation (CI). For each cohort, one sample contained pooled specimens collected from five patients and the second contained a specimen obtained from a single patient. Of the 271 proteins identified with high confidence among the samples, 71 proteins were common in every sample and used to conservatively define the proteome of human perilymph. Comparison to human cerebrospinal fluid and blood plasma, as well as murine perilymph, showed significant similarity in protein content across fluids; however, a quantitative comparison was not possible. Fifteen candidate biomarkers of VS were identified by comparing VS and CI samples. This list will be used in future investigations targeted at discriminating between VS tumors associated with good versus poor hearing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available