4.7 Article

Defining the Boundaries and Characterizing the Landscape of Functional Genome Expression in Vascular Tissues of Populus using Shotgun Proteomics

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 449-460

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr200851y

Keywords

plant proteomics; single amino acid polymorphisms; populus; mass spectrometry; protein inference; shotgun proteomics; vascular tissue; xylem; phloem

Funding

  1. BioEnergy Science Center, a U.S. Department of Energy
  2. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current state-of-the-art experimental and computational proteomic approaches were integrated to obtain a comprehensive protein profile of Populus vascular tissue. This featured: (1) a large sample set consisting of two genotypes grown under normal and tension stress conditions, (2) bioinformatics clustering to effectively handle gene duplication, and (3) an informatics approach to track and identify single amino acid polymorphisms (SAAPs). By applying a clustering algorithm to the Populus database, the number of protein entries decreased from 64689 proteins to a total of 43069 protein groups, thereby reducing 7505 identified proteins to a total of 4226 protein groups, in which 2016 were singletons. This reduction implies that similar to 50% of the measured proteins shared extensive sequence homology. Using conservative search criteria, we were able to identify 1354 peptides containing a SAAP and 201 peptides that become tryptic due to a K or R substitution. These newly identified peptides correspond to 502 proteins, including 97 previously unidentified proteins. In total, the integration of deep proteome measurements on an extensive sample set with protein clustering and peptide sequence variants provided an exceptional level of proteome characterization for Populus, allowing us to spatially resolve the vascular tissue proteome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available