4.8 Article

Enhanced rate performance of molybdenum-doped spinet LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathode materials for lithium ion battery

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 247, Issue -, Pages 778-785

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.031

Keywords

Lithium-ion battery; Cathode material; Rate capability; Lithium manganese oxide; Doping

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51274002]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520749]
  3. Zhejiang Postdoctoral Preferential Foundation [Bsh1201013]
  4. Program for Innovative Research Team in Anhui University of Technology [TD201202]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Anhui University of Technology [2012032]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Mo-doped LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 cathodes are successfully synthesized by citric acid-assisted sol-gel method. The result demonstrates that the Mo-doped LiMn1.4Ni0.55Mo0.05O4 cathodes present the improved electrochemical performance over pristine LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4. At the 2 C rate after 80 cycles, the discharge capacities are 68.5 mAh g(-1) for the pristine LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 material (53.9% of the capacity at 0.1 C), 107.4 mAh g(-1) for the LiMn1.425Ni0.5Mo0.05O4 material (82.1% at 0.1 C), and 122.7 mAh g(-1) for the LiMn1.4Ni0.55Mo0.05O4 material (90.5% at 0.1 C). Mo-doping is favorable for reducing the electrode polarization, suggesting that Mo-doped LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 electrodes have faster lithium insertion/extraction kinetics during cycling. Mo-doped LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 electrodes show lower charge-transfer resistance and higher lithium diffusion coefficients. In addition, LiMn1.4Ni0.55Mo0.05O4 cathode exhibits the smallest particle size, the lowest charge-transfer resistance and the highest lithium diffusion coefficient among all samples, indicating that it has a high reversibility and good rate capability. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available