4.8 Article

New phenothiazine-based dyes for efficient dye-sensitized solar cells: Positioning effect of a donor group on the cell performance

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 243, Issue -, Pages 253-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.157

Keywords

Organic dyes; Metal-free; Phenothiazine; Dye-sensitized solar cells; Positioning effect

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [HKBU202210, HKBU202811, HKBU203011]
  2. Hong Kong Baptist University [FRG2/11-12/007, FRG2/10-11/101, IRACE/11-12/04]
  3. Areas of Excellence Scheme, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong [AoE/P-03/08]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21029001]
  5. Science, Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20120615155451326]
  6. Center for Solar Energy Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of new phenothiazine-based dyes have been developed, in which Type 1 molecules are appended with a donor aryl group at the C(7) position and n-hexyl group at the N(10) of phenothiazine (PT1 and PT2), and Type 2 molecules are with the donor aryl group at the N(10) of phenothiazine (PT3 and PT4), together with a cyanoacrylate moiety at the C(3) position in both types of species. The structural features of a donor aryl group at the C(7) position of phenothiazine extends the it-conjugation of the chromophore, while the donor aryl group at N(10) significantly increases the steric hindrance of the dye due to its mutually perpendicular structural characteristics with either phenyl ring of bent phenothiazine. As a result, Type 1 dyes have better light harvesting properties in contact with TiO2 films, and give much better dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) performance than Type 2 dyes. The PT1-sensitized DSSC shows a high open-circuit voltage (V-oc) of 0.829 V and lead to a final power conversion efficiency of 6.72% based on PT1. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available