4.8 Article

The interaction of biomass gasification syngas components with tar in a solid oxide fuel cell and operational conditions to mitigate carbon deposition on nickel-gadolinium doped ceria anodes

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 196, Issue 11, Pages 5027-5034

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.02.011

Keywords

Biomass; Gasification; Tars; SOFC; Carbon

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G030995/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/G030995/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of biomass gasification with solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) is gaining increasing interest as an efficient and environmentally benign method of producing electricity and heat. However, tars in the gas stream arising from the gasification of biomass material can deposit carbon on the SOFC anode, having detrimental effects to the life cycle and operational characteristics of the fuel cell. This work examines the impact of biomass gasification syngas components combined with benzene as a model tar, on carbon formation on Ni/CGO (gadolinium-doped ceria) SOFC anodes. Thermodynamic calculations suggest that SOFCs operating at temperatures > 750 degrees C are not susceptible to carbon deposition from a typical biomass gasification syngas containing 15 g m(-3) benzene. However, intermediate temperature SOFCs operating at temperatures < 650 degrees C require threshold current densities well above what is technologically achievable to inhibit the effects of carbon deposition. SOFC anodes have been shown to withstand tar levels of 2-15 g m(-3) benzene at 765 degrees C for 3 h at a current density of 300 mA cm(-2), with negligible impact on the electrochemical performance of the anode. Furthermore, no carbon could be detected on the anode at this current density when benzene levels were <5 gm(-3). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available