4.6 Article

Biodegradation Behaviors of Poly(p-dioxanone) in Different Environment Media

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMERS AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 1088-1099

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10924-013-0613-z

Keywords

Aerobic biodegradation; Poly(p-dioxanone); Different biodegradation environments

Funding

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of China [IRT 1026]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51121001]
  3. High-Tech Research & Development Program [2012AA062904]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work was aimed at researching the aerobic biodegradation of poly(p-dioxanone) (PPDO), a novel kind of degradable polymer material, by simulating real-life conditions in a laboratory-scale test, specified by the standard methods based on two biodegradation environments, composting and aqueous media. To measure and describe the biodegradability of PPDO, not only had carbon dioxide produced by respiratory metabolism of microorganism been measured, which determines the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of chemical compounds, but also the detailed results of biodegradation were further characterized by monitoring physical, chemical and thermal properties changes of test materials at different incubation times in the two media, confirmed by using the appropriate analytical techniques. Scanning electron microscopy was used to observe the surface morphology, and the thermal performance of PPDO was characterized by differential scanning calorimetry. The changes of molecular weight were detected by intrinsic viscosity ([eta]) and gel permeation chromatography, and the variations of the molecular structure were monitored by the nuclear magnetic resonance and FT-IR. The results show that PPDO has outstanding character of biodegradation and may be more adapted for biodegrading in liquid medium than in composting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available