4.1 Article

Micromechanical Modeling of the Deformation Kinetics of Semicrystalline Polymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE PART B-POLYMER PHYSICS
Volume 49, Issue 18, Pages 1297-1310

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/polb.22297

Keywords

composite inclusion; computer modeling; double yield; Eyring flow rule; microdeformation; micromechanical modeling; microstructure; polyethylene (PE); power law relation; slip kinetics; structure-property relations; texture evolution; yielding

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW, applied science division of NWO
  2. Ministry of Economic Affairs [07730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanical behavior of semicrystalline polymers is strongly dependent on their crystallinity level, the initial underlying microstructure, and the evolution of this structure during deformation. A previously developed micromechanical constitutive model is used to capture the elasto-viscoplastic deformation and texture evolution in semicrystalline polymers. The model represents the material as an aggregate of two-phase layered composite inclusions, consisting of crystalline lamellae and amorphous layers. This work focuses on adding quantitative abilities to the multiscale constitutive model, in particular for the stress-dependence of the rate of plastic deformation, referred to as the slip kinetics. To do that, the previously used viscoplastic power law relation is replaced with an Eyring flow rule. The slip kinetics are then re-evaluated and characterized using a hybrid numerical/experimental procedure, and the results are validated for uniaxial compression data of HDPE, at various strain rates. A double yield phenomenon is observed in the model prediction. Texture analysis shows that the double yield point in the model is due to morphological changes during deformation, that induce a change of deformation mechanism. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 49: 1297-1310, 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available