4.5 Article

Cyclic nucleotide gated channel 10 negatively regulates salt tolerance by mediating Na+ transport in Arabidopsis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH
Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages 211-220

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-014-0679-2

Keywords

CNGC10; Na+ transport; Salt tolerance; Arabidopsis thaliana

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB114200]
  2. NSFC [31171461, 91117003]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYTZ201402, KYZ201423]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31100194, 31470364]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of cyclic nucleotide gated channel (CNGC) genes have been identified in plant genomes, but their functions are mainly undefined. In this study, we identified the role of CNGC10 in the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to salt stress. The cngc10 T-DNA insertion mutant showed greater tolerance to salt than wild-type A. thaliana during seed germination and seedling growth. The cngc10 mutant accumulated less Na+ and K+, but not less Ca2+, in shoots in response to salt stress. By contrast, overexpression of CNGC10 resulted in greater sensitivity to salt stress, and complementation of this gene recovered salt sensitivity. In response to salt stress, heterologous expression of CNGC10 in the Na+ sensitive yeast mutant strain B31 inhibited growth due to accumulation of Na+ at a rate greater than that of yeast transformed with an empty vector. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis demonstrated that CNGC10 was expressed mainly in roots and flowers. GUS analysis of a root cross section indicated that CNGC10 was expressed mainly in the endodermis and epidermis. Furthermore, the expression of CNGC10 in roots was dramatically inhibited by exposure to 200 mM NaCl for 6 h. These data suggest that CNGC10 negatively regulates salt tolerance in A. thaliana and may be involved in mediating Na+ transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available