4.5 Article

Meiotically asynapsis-induced aneuploidy in autopolyploid Arabidopsis thaliana

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT RESEARCH
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 87-95

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10265-009-0262-4

Keywords

Asynapsis; Aneuploidy; Autopolyploid; Chromosome; Arabidopsis

Categories

Funding

  1. Gregor Mendel Institute of Plant Molecular Biology in Vienna
  2. Austrian exchange service (OAD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The patterns of homologue segregation are the basis for euploidy or aneuploidy formation in diploids and allo-/auto-polyploids. Homologue segregation in diploids resembles that in allopolyploids during meiosis; however, meiotic chromosome behavior in autopolyploids is complicated by multiplication of homologous chromosome components. Obviously, loss of single chromosomes (or segmented chromosomes) frequently leads to abortion of reproductive gametes in diploids and allopolyploids. In contrast, the consequence of chromosome loss in autopolyploids is effortlessly compensated for by the presence of multiplied chromosome complements. Here, we use the meiotically asynaptic gene asy1, in combination with polyploidization, to elucidate aneuploidy formation in autotetraploid Arabidopsis. The results indicate that, due to homologous asynapsis in meiotic prophase I, retarded chromosome losses could induce aneuploidy during gametogenesis in autotetraploid asy1. The severe loss of individual chromosomes probably reaches the haploid genome among selfed or backcrossed progeny, leading to stochastic chromosome loss in Arabidopsis. Reciprocal crosses of autotetraploid asy1 with wild-type prove a pathway of duoparental transmission of aneuploidy (hypoploidy and hyperploidy). Viable hypoploids over-transmit via male gametes; conversely, viable hyperploids transmit mainly in female gametogenesis. This result suggests a more stringent maternal restriction of ploidy transmission in autopolyploid Arabidopsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available