4.4 Article

Linkages between woody plant proliferation dynamics and plant physiological traits in southwestern North America

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 407-416

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rts002

Keywords

shrub encroachment; C(4)grass; physiological characteristics; leaf traits

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Woody plant encroachments in arid and semiarid ecosystems are widely reported but the physiological mechanisms still need to be further revealed. In the current study, we aim to determine whether differences in leaf physiological traits help explain grassland susceptibility to woody plant encroachment and whether distinctive physiological adaptations allow some shrub species to invade grasslands. We compared physiological traits (photosynthesis, leaf water status, pigment compositions and leaf antioxidant capacities) of six species representing three functional groups: woody encroachers (Prosopis velutina, Larrea tridentata), woody non-encroachers (Acacia greggii, Lycium fremontii) and C4 grasses (Bouteloua curtipendula, Bouteloua barbata) which are naturally growing in a botanical garden in University of Arizona, USA. We infer that P. velutina (encroacher) but not A. greggii or L. fremontii (non-encroachers) is encroaching in grasslands because the former species has higher water and light utilization efficiencies (instantaneous water use efficiency, instantaneous light use efficiency, and Fv/Fm). The extremely high carotenoid and total antioxidant capacity in its leaves appears to help the shrub L. tridentata (encroacher) survive high ambient oxidative damage caused by both drought and high light stresses in this grassland. The two C-4 grass species, B. curtipendula and B. barbata, grow well in the arid ecosystem but may be susceptible to disturbances.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available