4.6 Article

Resynthesis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate mediates adaptation of the caffeine response in rat taste receptor cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 587, Issue 2, Pages 363-377

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.165167

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH NIDCD [DC00401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Caffeine, a prototypic bitter stimulus, produces several physiological actions on taste receptor cells that include inhibition of K-IR and K-V potassium currents and elevations of intracellular calcium. These responses display adaptation, i.e. their magnitude diminishes in the sustained presence of the stimulus. Levels of the membrane lipid phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) are well known to modulate many potassium channels, activating the channel by stabilizing its open state. Here we investigate a putative relationship of K-IR and K-V with PIP2 levels hypothesizing that inhibition of these currents by caffeine might be allayed by PIP2 resynthesis. Using standard patch-clamp techniques, recordings of either potassium current from rat posterior taste receptor cells produced essentially parallel results when PIP2 levels were manipulated pharmacologically. Increasing PIP2 levels by blocking phosphoinositide-3 kinase with wortmannin or LY294002, or by blocking phospholipase C with U73122 all significantly increased the incidence of adaptation for both K-IR and K-V. Conversely, lowering PIP2 synthesis by blocking PI4K or using the PIP2 scavengers polylysine or bovine serum albumin reduced the incidence of adaptation. Adaptation could be modulated by activation of protein kinase C but not calcium calmodulin kinase. Collectively, these data support two highly novel conclusions: potassium currents in taste receptor cells are significantly modulated by PIP2 levels and PIP2 resynthesis may play a central role in the gustatory adaptation process at the primary receptor cell level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available