4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase separation, crystallization and polyamorphism in the Y2O3-Al2O3 system

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER
Volume 20, Issue 20, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/20/205103

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E017177/1, EP/C003594/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/E017177/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A detailed study of glass formation from aerodynamically levitated liquids in the (Y2O3) x (Al2O3)(1-x) system for the composition range 0.21 <= x <= 0.41 was undertaken by using pyrometric, optical imaging and x-ray diffraction methods. Homogeneous and clear single-phase glasses were produced over the composition range 0.27 less than or similar to x less than or similar to 0.33. For Y2O3-rich compositions (0.33 <= x <= 0.375), cloudy materials were produced which contain inclusions of crystalline yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) of diameter up to 40 mu m in a glassy matrix. For Y2O3-poor compositions around x = 0.24, cloudy materials were also produced, but it was not possible to deduce whether this resulted from (i) sub-micron inclusions of a nano-crystalline or glassy material in a glassy matrix or (ii) a glass formed by spinodal decomposition. For x = 0.21, however, the sample cloudiness results from crystallization into at least two phases comprising yttrium aluminium perovskite and alumina. The associated pyrometric cooling curve shows slow recalescence events with a continuous and slow evolution of excess heat which contrasts with the sharp recalescence events observed for the crystallization of YAG at compositions near x = 0.375. The materials that are the most likely candidates for demonstrating homogeneous nucleation of a second liquid phase occur around x = 0.25, which corresponds to the limit for formation of a continuous random network of corner-shared AlO4 tetrahedra.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available