Fast and Accurate Prediction of Numerical Relativity Waveforms from Binary Black Hole Coalescences Using Surrogate Models
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Fast and Accurate Prediction of Numerical Relativity Waveforms from Binary Black Hole Coalescences Using Surrogate Models
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages -
Publisher
American Physical Society (APS)
Online
2015-09-19
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.115.121102
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Improved methods for simulating nearly extremal binary black holes
- (2015) Mark A Scheel et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Frequency-domain reduced order models for gravitational waves from aligned-spin compact binaries
- (2014) Michael Pürrer CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- The NINJA-2 project: detecting and characterizing gravitational waveforms modelled using numerical binary black hole simulations
- (2014) J Aasi et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Key elements of robustness in binary black hole evolutions using spectral methods
- (2014) Béla Szilágyi INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS D
- Template banks for binary black hole searches with numerical relativity waveforms
- (2014) Prayush Kumar et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Sparse Representations of Gravitational Waves from Precessing Compact Binaries
- (2014) Jonathan Blackman et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Simple Model of Complete Precessing Black-Hole-Binary Gravitational Waveforms
- (2014) Mark Hannam et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Fast Prediction and Evaluation of Gravitational Waveforms Using Surrogate Models
- (2014) Scott E. Field et al. Physical Review X
- Error-analysis and comparison to analytical models of numerical waveforms produced by the NRAR Collaboration
- (2013) Ian Hinder et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Characteristic Evolution and Matching
- (2013) Jeffrey Winicour Living Reviews in Relativity
- Comparing gravitational waves from nonprecessing and precessing black hole binaries in the corotating frame
- (2013) L. Pekowsky et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Improved effective-one-body description of coalescing nonspinning black-hole binaries and its numerical-relativity completion
- (2013) Thibault Damour et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Comparing gravitational waveform extrapolation to Cauchy-characteristic extraction in binary black hole simulations
- (2013) Nicholas W. Taylor et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Catalog of 174 Binary Black Hole Simulations for Gravitational Wave Astronomy
- (2013) Abdul H. Mroué et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- The NINJA-2 catalog of hybrid post-Newtonian/numerical-relativity waveforms for non-precessing black-hole binaries
- (2012) P Ajith et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Prototype effective-one-body model for nonprecessing spinning inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms
- (2012) Andrea Taracchini et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Notes on the integration of numerical relativity waveforms
- (2011) Christian Reisswig et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Characteristic extraction tool for gravitational waveforms
- (2011) M. C. Babiuc et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Search for gravitational waves from binary black hole inspiral, merger, and ringdown
- (2011) J. Abadie et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Inspiral-merger-ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black-hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism
- (2011) Yi Pan et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Reducing orbital eccentricity of precessing black-hole binaries
- (2011) Alessandra Buonanno et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Reduced Basis Catalogs for Gravitational Wave Templates
- (2011) Scott E. Field et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Convergence Rates for Greedy Algorithms in Reduced Basis Methods
- (2011) Peter Binev et al. SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS
- Predictions for the rates of compact binary coalescences observable by ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
- (2010) J Abadie et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- A tapering window for time-domain templates and simulated signals in the detection of gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries
- (2010) D J A McKechan et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Advanced LIGO: the next generation of gravitational wave detectors
- (2010) Gregory M Harry et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Matching post-Newtonian and numerical relativity waveforms: Systematic errors and a new phenomenological model for nonprecessing black hole binaries
- (2010) L. Santamaría et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: Coalescence of nonprecessing, spinning, equal-mass black holes
- (2010) Yi Pan et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Measuring orbital eccentricity and periastron advance in quasicircular black hole simulations
- (2010) Abdul H. Mroué et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Certified Reduced Basis Methods and Output Bounds for the Harmonic Maxwell's Equations
- (2010) Yanlai Chen et al. SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING
- Testing gravitational-wave searches with numerical relativity waveforms: results from the first Numerical INJection Analysis (NINJA) project
- (2009) Benjamin Aylott et al. CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY
- Effective-one-body waveforms calibrated to numerical relativity simulations: Coalescence of nonspinning, equal-mass black holes
- (2009) Alessandra Buonanno et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Improved analytical description of inspiralling and coalescing black-hole binaries
- (2009) Thibault Damour et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational-wave memory for quasicircular, inspiralling compact binaries
- (2009) Marc Favata PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- A general multipurpose interpolation procedure: the magic points
- (2008) Yvon Maday et al. COMMUNICATIONS ON PURE AND APPLIED ANALYSIS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started