4.6 Article

The Characterization, Stability, and Reactivity of Synthetic Calcium Silicate Surfaces from First Principles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 118, Issue 28, Pages 15214-15219

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp408325f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Concrete Sustainability Hub at MIT
  2. Portland Cement Association (PCA)
  3. RMC Research and Education Foundation
  4. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. National Science Foundation through TeraGrid resources by TACC [TG-DMR090027]
  6. Bilim Akademisi - The Science Academy, Turkey, under the BAGEP program
  7. TUBITAK ULAKBIM
  8. High Performance and Grid Computing Center (TR-Grid e-Infrastructure)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcium silicate compounds belong to a complicated class of silicates. Among their many industrial applications, calcium silicates are heavily used as a building material as they constitute the main ingredient in today's cement clinker. We report here an extensive surface analysis of synthetic calcium silicate phases (tricalcium silicate, C3S, and dicalcium silicate, C2S) using first-principles computational methods. We calculate surface energies (gamma) for all lower-index orientations and determine the most stable surfaces as well as the equilibrium Wulff structures. We analyze the variation of gamma with surface coordination number and find an interesting and unexpected trend where loss of coordination of ionic Ca and O atoms can lower gamma. The stability of surface orientations is examined as a function of oxygen partial pressure. Finally, we compute the energy required to remove Ca from different surfaces and find that it is inversely proportional to gamma, supporting the energetic preference of extracting atoms from higher energy surfaces. Knowledge of the atomic structure and properties of calcium silicate surfaces is important for understanding and controlling the hydration of such systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available