4.5 Article

Coherent Transport and Energy Flow Patterns in Photosynthesis under Incoherent Excitation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 118, Issue 10, Pages 2693-2702

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp500746a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF MRSEC [DMR 08-02054]
  2. AFOSR [FA9550-09-1-0117]
  3. DTRA [HDTRA1-10-1-0091]
  4. DARPA QuBE program [N66001-10-1-4060]
  5. DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellowship [DE-FG02-97ER25308]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-05ER46225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long-lived coherences have been observed in photosynthetic complexes after laser excitation, inspiring new theories regarding the extreme quantum efficiency of photosynthetic energy transfer. Whether coherent (ballistic) transport occurs in nature and whether it improves photosynthetic efficiency remain topics of debate. Here, we use a non-equilibrium Green's function analysis to model exciton transport after excitation from an incoherent source (as opposed to coherent laser excitation). We find that even with an incoherent source, the rate of environmental dephasing strongly affects exciton transport efficiency, suggesting that the relationship between dephasing and efficiency is not an artifact of coherent excitation. The Green's function analysis provides a clear view of both the pattern of excitonic fluxes among chromophores and the multidirectionality of energy transfer that is a feature of coherent transport. We see that even in the presence of an incoherent source, transport occurs by qualitatively different mechanisms as dephasing increases. Our approach can be generalized to complex synthetic systems and may provide a new tool for optimizing synthetic light harvesting materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available