4.5 Article

Gelation of a Solution of Poly(3-hexylthiophene) Greatly Retards Its Crystallization Rate in the Subsequently Cast Film

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Volume 118, Issue 49, Pages 14510-14518

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp508775b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 102-2633-M-007-002]
  2. Frontier Center of Fundamental and Applied Sciences of Matters of the National Tsing Hua University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the crystallization rate of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) in the film cast from the gel (called gel-cast film) with that in the film cast from the liquid solution (called solution-cast film) to understand the effect of solution structure on the structural development in the subsequently cast film of conjugated polymer. P3HT was found to form a homogeneous liquid solution with xylene at elevated temperature. When the freshly prepared semidilute solution was allowed to age at room temperature, the solution transformed into a gel in which a significant amount of nanowhiskers formed. The nanowhiskers in the gel were effectively transferred to the corresponding cast film, while the film cast from the freshly prepared solution only contained a small amount of such a morphological entity. The in situ small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurement and thermal analysis revealed that both the cold and melt crystallization of P3HT in the gel-cast film were much slower than those in the solution-cast counterpart. The retardation of crystallization rate in the gel-cast film was attributed to the abundance of the nanowhiskers. In this case, the crystallization of P3HT occurred predominantly within the individual nanowhiskers and the mesh regions in the networks of the whiskers, where their limited sizes in at least one dimension imposed a strong spatial constraint to the crystal growth and chain motion for crystallization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available