4.6 Article

Reinvestigation of the Reaction of Ethylene and Singlet Oxygen by the Approximate Spin Projection Method. Comparison with Multireference Coupled-Cluster Calculations

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 114, Issue 30, Pages 7967-7974

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp102635s

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists (JSPS) [19750046, 19350070]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [22108515]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22108515] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We quantify a spin contamination error caused by a broken-symmetry (BS) method on the geometry at the stationary points and barrier heights of the [2 + 2] reaction between singlet oxygen and ethylene, which goes through a diradical intermediate. Several hybrid GGA, hybrid meta-GGA, and long-range corrected hybrid functionals, O3LYP, B3LYP, PBE0, MPW1B95, BHandHLYP, and omega B97X, are examined to elucidate their original nature without the spill contamination error. For that purpose, the geometry of each reaction step for the BS state as well as its total energy is corrected by using an approximate spin projection method. The CCSD and CCSD(T) single-point calculations are also carried out at optimized geometries at the DFT level to confirm the results of the DFT methods. The single-point calculations by means of Mukherjee's multireference coupled cluster with single and double excitations at CASSCF(10e,8o)-optimized geometries are also presented to assess the DFT methods. After the energy and geometry corrections, the barrier height of each functional is consistent with conventional closed-shell-type reactions even in the reaction involving singlet diradical species. We also find that the spin contamination error on the geometric change is not negligible especially at the early stage of the reaction (similar to 3 kcal/mol), where the triplet state is the ground state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available