4.5 Article

CULTURE AND BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF A TEA ALGAL PATHOGEN, CEPHALEUROS PARASITICUS1

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 1017-1023

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00879.x

Keywords

algae; Cephaleuros parasiticus; leaf disease; proteins; red rust; SDS-PAGE; tea

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi (Government of India)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the current situation regarding the incidence of red rust disease in tea plants, an extensive survey was conducted in southern Indian tea plantations covering different tea cultivars and agroclimatic zones. The results indicated that the incidence of disease was more severe in tea seedlings than clones in all the agroclimatic zones. On the other hand, a simple, reliable, and reproducible technique was standardized for culturing Cephaleuros parasiticus G. Karst. isolated from infected tea leaves. Ten isolates were obtained, of which two were screened based on growth rate and culture characters for further studies. Ten culture media were tested for the culturing of C. parasiticus in which Trebouxia and Bristol media were the best followed by George, Go algal, and tea leaf extract media. Variations between isolates (Valparai C. parasiticus field number 27 [VCP27], Munnar C. parasiticus field number 11 [MCP11], and University of Texas culture number 2412 [UTEX2412]) of C. parasiticus were studied based on the growth pattern, protein expression profile, and cellular constituents in the filaments. The quantitative estimation of cellular constituents showed that there was no significant difference in these constituents among isolates. The detection of amino acids in the filaments of C. parasiticus isolates showed 16 free forms and 11 bound forms. Amino acids in bound form were higher in all the isolates than in free form of amino acids. The three isolates of C. parasiticus were closely related, with bands lying between the molecular weight of 116 and 35 kDa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available