4.6 Article

Synthesis, photophysical properties and sugar-dependent in vitro photocytotoxicity of pyrrolidine-fused chlorins bearing S-glycosides

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.07.007

Keywords

Photodynamic therapy (PDT); S-glycosylated porphyrin; S-glycosylated chlorin; Reactive oxygen species (ROS); Cellular uptake; Photocytotoxicity

Funding

  1. NAIST Presidential Special Fund
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology (MEXT) of the Japanese Government
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  4. Japan Science Society, a Nara Women's University Intramural Grant
  5. Kao Foundation for Arts and Sciences
  6. OSAKA GAS
  7. San-EiGen Foundation for Chemical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eight S-glycosylated 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(tetrafluorophenyl)porphyrins (1a', 1b', la and 11b (a: S-glucosylated, b: S-galactosylated)) and their 1,3-dipolar cycloadducts, i.e. chlorins 2a', 2b', 2a and 2b were prepared by nucleophilic substitution of the pentafluorophenyl groups with S-glycoside. These photosensitizers were characterized by (1)H, (13)C and (91)F NMR spectroscopies and elemental analysis. The photocytotoxicity of the S-glycosylated photosensitizers and the parent porphyrin (1) and chlorin (2) was examined in HeLa cells. Photosensitizers 1, 2, 1a', 1b', 2a, and 2b, showed no significant photocytotoxicity at the concentration of 0.5 mu M, while the deprotected photosensitizers la, 1b, 2a and 2b were photocytotoxic. The strong inhibition by sodium azide of the photocytotoxicity of these photosensitizers suggested that 102 is the main mediator. The S-glucosylated photosensitizers; la and 2a showed higher photocytotoxicity than S-galactosylated 1b and 2b, respectively. The cellular uptake of la and 2a increased up to 24 h, while that of 1b and 2b was saturated by 12 h. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available