4.7 Article

Testing the dark energy consistency with geometry and growth

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.91.063009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE [DE-FG02-95ER40899]
  2. NSF [AST-0807564, 1066293]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1210974] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We perform parametric tests of the consistency of the standard wCDM model in the framework of general relativity by carefully separating information between the geometry and growth of structure. We replace each late-Universe parameter that describes the behavior of dark energy with two parameters: one describing geometrical information in cosmological probes, and the other controlling the growth of structure. We use data from all principal cosmological probes; of these, Type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, and the peak locations in the cosmic microwave background angular power spectrum constrain the geometry, while the redshift space distortions, weak gravitational lensing, and abundance of galaxy clusters constrain both geometry and growth. Both geometry and growth separately favor the Lambda CDM cosmology with the matter density relative to critical Omega(M) similar or equal to 0.3. When the equation of state is allowed to vary separately for probes of growth and geometry, we find again a good agreement with the Lambda CDM value (w similar or equal to -1), with the major exception of redshift-space distortions which favor less growth than in Lambda CDM at 3-sigma confidence, favoring the equation of state w(grow) similar or equal to -0.8. The anomalous growth favored by redshift space distortions has been noted earlier, and is common to all Redshift space distortions data sets, but may well be caused by systematics, or be explained by the sum of the neutrino masses higher than that expected from the simplest mass hierarchies, m(nu) similar or equal to 0.45 eV. On the whole, the constraints are tight even in the new, larger parameter space due to impressive complementarity of different cosmological probes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available