4.5 Article

On the Cellular Uptake and Membrane Effect of the Multifunctional Peptide, TatLK15

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 103, Issue 1, Pages 293-304

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.23778

Keywords

cell penetrating peptide; peptide delivery; Tat; cell; membrane translocation; diffusion; toxicity; image analysis; fluorescence spectroscopy; circular dichroism

Funding

  1. Iraqi Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the multifunctional peptide TatLK15 resulting from the fusion of the cell penetrating peptide Tat and the amphipathic peptide LK15 was shown to be efficient at mediating siRNA and shRNA delivery in leukemia cells to silence the bcr-abl oncoprotein. The present study focused on TatLK15 peptide cellular uptake and defining conditions for its use within a range of doses exhibiting minimal toxicity. The initial part of the study carried out in solution confirmed that the insertion of a glycine bridge allowed retention of the LK15 -helicity, and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy did not reveal preferential conformations at the studied concentrations. In the second part, TatLK15 uptake mechanisms appeared peptide dose- and cell line- dependent as well as requiring membrane potential. Below a critical dose, TatLK15 toxicity appeared limited for approximately three hours as demonstrated by the combined use of lactate dehydrogenase release, MTT assays, and time-dependent observation of membrane-impermeant dye uptake using high content screening apparatus. Furthermore, toxicity was observed to occur rapidly at higher peptide doses. Finally, a comparison between TatLK15 and another Tat amphipathic peptide construct suggested that -helix content should be viewed as a key element in the development of similar peptides. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 103:293-304, 2014

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available