4.5 Article

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic tissue compartment model selection in drug development and risk assessment

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages 424-435

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22768

Keywords

pharmacokinetics; physiological model; well stirred model; tissue partition; in silico modeling; physicochemical; singular perturbation; asymptotic matching; flow-limited; compartmental modeling

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [GM094503, HL007852]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A well-stirred tank (WST) has been the predominant flow-limited tissue compartment model in physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Recently, we developed a two-region asymptotically reduced (TAR) PBPK tissue compartment model through an asymptotic approximation to a two-region vascularextravascular system to incorporate more biophysical detail than the WST model. To determine the relevance of a flow-limited TAR (F-TAR) approach, 75 structurally diverse drugs were evaluated herein using a priori predicted tissue:plasma partition coefficients along with hybrid and whole-body PBPK of eight rat tissues to determine the impact of model selection on simulation and optimization. Simulations showed that the F-TAR model significantly improved the ability to predict drug exposure, with hybrid and whole-body WST model error approaching 50% for tissues with larger vascular volumes. When optimization was used to fit F-TAR and WST models to pseudo data, WST-optimized drug partition coefficients more appropriately represented curve-fitting parameters rather than biophysically meaningful partition coefficients. Median F-TAR-optimized error ranged from -0.4% to +0.3%, whereas WST-optimized median error ranged from -22.2% to +1.8%. These studies demonstrated that the use of F-TAR represents a more accurate, biophysically realistic PBPK tissue model for predicting tissue exposure to drug and that it should be considered for use in drug development and regulatory review. (c) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 101:424-435, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available