4.5 Article

Buffer-Dependent Fragmentation of a Humanized Full-Length Monoclonal Antibody

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 99, Issue 7, Pages 2962-2974

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1002/jps.22056

Keywords

biotechnology; chemical stability; formulation; protein folding/refolding; protein formulation; proteins

Funding

  1. MedImmune

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During storage stability studies of a monoclonal antibody (mAb) it was determined that the primary route of degradation involved fragmentation into lower molecular weight species. The fragmentation was characterized with size-exclusion high performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC), SDS PAGE, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. Fragmentation proceeded via hydrolysis, likely catalyzed by trace metal ions, of a peptide bond in the hinge region of the mAb's heavy chain, which produced two prominent low molecular weight species during storage: a single, free Fab fragment and a Fab + Fc fragment. The fragmentation is observed in phosphate-buffered solutions at two ionic strengths but not in histidine-buffered solutions at identical ionic strengths. Chaotrope-induced and thermally induced unfolding studies of the mAb indicated differences in the unfolding pathways between the two buffer solutions. The folding intermediate observed during chaotrope-induced unfolding was further characterized by intrinsic fluorescence quenching, which suggested that a small portion of the molecule is resistant to chaotrope-induced unfolding in histidine buffer systems. The thermally induced unfolding indicates a reduction in cooperativity of the unfolding process in the presence of histidine relative to phosphate. A relationship between the histidine-induced effects on unfolding pathway and the relative resistance to fragmentation is suggested. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 99:2962-2974, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available