4.6 Article

Evaluation of an LC-MS/MS assay for 15N-nitrite for cellular studies of L-arginine action

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 1127-1131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2011.08.017

Keywords

Nitric oxide; L-Arginine; Nitrite; LC-MS/MS

Funding

  1. NIH [HL081580]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The utility of an LC-MS/MS assay for nitrite determination in studying L-arginine (ARG) cellular action was examined in vitro. EA.hy926 human endothelial cells or cellular fractions (membrane and cytosol) were exposed to 0-500 mu M of N-15(4)-ARG for 2h. N-14-nitrite and N-15-nitrite in the cell lysate and in the incubation medium were derivatized with 2,3-diaminonaphthalene (DAN) to form N-14- and N-15-naphthotriazole (i.e., N-14-NAT and N-15-NAT). Peak responses of N-14-NAT and N-15-NAT were analyzed by LC-MS/MS with 1H-naphth[2,3-d]imidazole as an internal standard. The calibration curves of DAN-derivatized N-14-NAT and N-15-NAT from N-14-nitrite and N-15-nitrite were linear. Intra- and inter-day variability of the quantification was below 14.2% in quality control samples. Following incubation of EA.hy926 cells with N-15(4)-ARG, saturable increases of N-15-nitrite accumulation with increasing N-15(4)-ARG exposure were observed clearly. This increase however could not be detected by the classical fluorescence method, nor were changes in N-14-nitrite level observed. When cellular fractions were exposed to N-15(4)-ARG, N-15-nitrite formation was only observed in the membrane fragments. The sensitive and selective LC-MS/MS method reported here can be applied to quantify accumulated nitrite levels in human endothelial cells. The selectivity of this stable-isotope labeled LC-MS/MS method offers an advantage over other traditional methods for elucidating cellular ARC action when its stable isotope is employed as a substrate. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available