4.6 Article

Do the interactions among natural enemies compromise the biological control of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci?

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE
Volume 87, Issue 1, Pages 133-141

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-013-0522-x

Keywords

Gut-content analysis; Intraguild predation; Parasitoids; Polyphagous predators; Specific primers; Whiteflies

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [AGL2008-00546, AGL2010-18811]
  2. FPI grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) is a worldwide pest which has become one of the main pests in tomato crops. The predators Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) and Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Hemiptera: Miridae) and the parasitoid Eretmocerus mundus (Mercet) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) have shown their efficacy at controlling B. tabaci populations when used as biological control agents. Intraguild predation (IGP) between natural enemies can affect their effectiveness at controlling pests. In the present study, the interaction of these three natural enemies and their effect on B. tabaci was studied on tomato plants by combining morphological observations and molecular analysis of trophic interactions. Under the conditions used in the present study, no IGP was detected between M. pygmaeus and N. tenuis by either counting dead predators or by PCR using prey-specific cytochrome c oxidase I primers. However, predation on B. tabaci decreased when they coexisted on the same plant, which could compromise the biological control of this pest. Although PCR analyses using E. mundus-specific primers showed predation on B. tabaci-parasitized nymphs in 27 % of M. pygmaeus and 17 % of N. tenuis, B. tabaci control was improved when both predators coexisted on the same plant with the parasitoid. The combined use of E. mundus and M. pygmaeus/N. tenuis is therefore recommended in order to improve B. tabaci control in conservation biological control strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available