4.0 Article

Coping With the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Experience Parents' Strategies and Views of Staff Support

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages 343-352

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e318270ffe5

Keywords

infant; intensive care units; neonatal; parenting; premature; qualitative research; stress

Funding

  1. Department of Neonatology at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
  2. Division of Newborn Medicine at Children's Hospital in Boston

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is stressful for parents to have an infant in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). To better understand the parents' experience and the role of staff, we examined parental reports of their NICU experiences, coping strategies, and views of the ways NICU staff supported them. Between June and July 2007, we interviewed 29 current and graduate parents from the study institution's NICU. A trained researcher conducted all interviews, which were recorded and transcribed. This was a qualitative analysis of prospectively collected interview data. Parents used the following coping strategies: (1) participating in care of the child; (2) getting away from the NICU; (3) gathering information; (4) involvement of friends and family; and (5) engagement with other NICU parents. Staff can support the parents' coping strategies in the following ways: (1) facilitating participation of the parents with the infant's care; (2) emphasizing documentation of the infant's progress; (3) demonstrating affection for the infant; (4) addressing concerns that make parents hesitant to leave the NICU; (5) providing accurate, consistent clinical information; (6) limiting unscheduled nonemergency phone calls; and (7) arranging voluntarily activities or programs in which parents whose infants have similar medical conditions may interact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available