4.6 Article

Randomized Crossover Study of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Preterm Infants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 161, Issue 5, Pages 808-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.04.040

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Research and Development Project of Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea [A080588-1122-1260200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To determine whether neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA), a new method of mechanical ventilation that delivers pressure assistance that is proportional to the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), could lower the inspiratory pressure and respiratory muscle load in preterm infants supported with ventilators. Study design Twenty-six mechanically ventilated preterm infants were randomized to crossover ventilation with NAVA and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) with pressure support (PS) for 4 hours each in a randomized order. A 1-hour interval for washout was provided between the 2 modes of ventilation. The ventilator settings were adjusted to maintain similar levels of end-tidal partial pressure of CO2. The ventilator parameters, vital signs, and gas exchange effects under the 2 ventilatory modes were compared. Results Nineteen infants completed the 9-hour crossover comparison protocol. Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), work of breathing, and peak EAdi with NAVA were lower than those in SIMV with PS. Calculated tidal volume to peak EAdi ratio and PIP to peak EAdi ratio were higher with NAVA. There were no significant differences in mean airway pressure, inspiratory oxygen fraction, and blood gas values. The measurements of vital signs did not differ significantly between the 2 modes. Conclusion NAVA lowered PIP and reduced respiratory muscle load in preterm infants at equivalent inspiratory oxygen fraction and partial pressure of CO2 of capillary blood in comparison with SIMV with PS. (J Pediatr 2012;161:808-13).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available