4.6 Article

Girls with Premature Adrenarche Have Accelerated Early Childhood Growth

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages 882-887

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.12.038

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Kuopio University Hospital
  2. Pediatric Research Foundation
  3. National Graduate School of Clinical Investigation
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. Finnish Medical Foundation
  6. Sigrid Jusdlius Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the effect of premature adrenarche (PA) on prepubertal growth. Study design The prepubertal growth of 54 girls with PA and 52 control girls was analyzed retrospectively. Birth measures were noted, and childhood length/height and weight were measured annually until age 5 years and at the current visit (at a median age of 7.6 years). The growth variables were correlated with serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and insulin concentrations. Results There were no significant differences in birth length or weight standard deviation scores (SDSs) between the 2 study groups. The girls with PA demonstrated a significant length SDS increment during the first 2 years of life (median +1.0 SDS; P < .001). Compared with controls, they were taller (median current height 1.2 vs 0 SDS; P < .001) and gained more weight throughout childhood. The difference in weight-for-height became significant at a later age compared with the difference in height. Median serum IGF-1 concentration adjusted for both age and body mass index SDS was higher in the PA group (24 vs 19 nmol/L; P < .031). Conclusions PA was not associated with small birth size in our population. Girls with PA had enhanced growth already in early childhood, which was not explained by weight gain. Enhanced IGF-1 production may contribute to the prepubertal growth acceleration in PA. (J Pediatr 2009;154:882-7)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available