4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Resection-induced intestinal adaptation and the role of enteric smooth muscle

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 1011-1017

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2008.02.015

Keywords

intestinal resection; adaptation; enteric smooth muscle; epidermal growth factor receptor; hyperplasia; intestinal contractility

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK53234, R24 DK064403] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Intestinal adaptation after massive small bowel resection (SBR) involves all layers of the bowel wall. Most prior work has focused on changes that occur in the intestinal mucosa. However, the contribution of the underlying intestinal smooth muscle (ISM) to the overall adaptation response remains unclear. Methods: Male C5713L/6 or waved-2 (diminished activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor) mice : underwent a 50% proximal SBR or sham operation, and the remnant ileum was harvested 3, 7, and 28 days. Markers of adaptation (villus height,bowel length, circumference, and ISM thickness) and ISM proliferation were recorded. Contractility was measured by attaching the distal ileum to strain gauge transducers and exposed to varying doses of carbachol. Results: Intestinal smooth muscle thickness was unchanged at any given time-point after resection; however, the bowel caliber and length were increased, and augmented rates of ISM proliferation were identified. Contractility was increased at 7 days after SBR. Waved-2 mice demonstrated minimal proliferation or intestinal lengthening in response to SBR. Conclusion: Compared with resection-induced thickening of the mucosa, proliferative changes in the ISM are unique and primarily affect bowel caliber, length, and contractility. Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling appears to play a significant role in adaptation of the ISM cellular compartment. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available