4.0 Article

Atypical Teratoid or Rhabdoid Tumors: Improved Outcome With High-dose Chemotherapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages E182-E186

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181dce1a2

Keywords

atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor; high dose chemotherapy; radiotherapy; neurocognitive outcome

Funding

  1. [ETR407]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To retrospectively review an institutional experience in managing atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) of the Central Nervous System with high-dose chemotherapy in infants and children less than 4 years old. Materials/Methods: Eight AT/RT patients were identified during the study period 2003 to 2008. Tumor location was supratentorial in 3 cases, infratentorial in 3 cases, and multifocal in 2 patients. Five patients presented with leptomeningeal dissemination. Two of these patients did not receive any active therapy. After surgery, the 6 remaining patients received induction therapy followed by sequential high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. Two patients receive focal irradiation. Results: At a median follow-up of 52 months, 4 patients are alive without evidence of tumor. Three of these patients, including 2 with metastatic disease were not irradiated. However, all surviving patients exhibit neuro-cognitive impairment, either at baseline assessment or upon follow-up. Conclusions: This experience confirms that a subset of young AT/RT patients may achieve long-term survival with intensive and high-dose chemotherapy. The role of radiotherapy is still unclear. However, evidence of neuro-cognitive impairment even in the absence of radiotherapy in this young population suggests that systematic introduction of radiotherapy in current protocols should be carefully assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available