4.5 Article

Multi-objective list scheduling of workflow applications in distributed computing infrastructures

Journal

JOURNAL OF PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 2152-2165

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2013.12.004

Keywords

Multi-objective scheduling; Scientific workflows; Distributed computing infrastructures

Funding

  1. University of Innsbruck (Doktoratsstipendium NEU aus der Nachwuchsforderung)
  2. Austrian Science Fund [TRP 237-N23]
  3. Standortagentur Tirol (project RainCloud)
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [TRP 237] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [TRP237] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Executing large-scale applications in distributed computing infrastructures (DCI), for example modern Cloud environments, involves optimization of several conflicting objectives such as makespan, reliability, energy, or economic cost. Despite this trend, scheduling in heterogeneous DCIs has been traditionally approached as a single or bi-criteria optimization problem. In this paper, we propose a generic multi-objective optimization framework supported by a list scheduling heuristic for scientific workflows in heterogeneous DCIs. The algorithm approximates the optimal solution by considering user-specified constraints on objectives in a dual strategy: maximizing the distance to the user's constraints for dominant solutions and minimizing it otherwise. We instantiate the framework and algorithm for a four-objective case study comprising makespan, economic cost, energy consumption, and reliability as optimization goals. We implemented our method as part of the ASKALON environment (Fahringer et al., 2007) for Grid and Cloud computing and demonstrate through extensive real and synthetic simulation experiments that our algorithm outperforms related bi-criteria heuristics while meeting the user constraints most of the time. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available